Alan Greenspan Essay Example for Free

Alan Greenspan Essay Mr. Alan Greenspan was born on March 6, 1926 in New York City. He had made his name as an astute American Economist. He had been the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve of the United States during the years 1987 to 2006. He presently advises different sectors on society in term of economics with his own GreenSpan Associates, LLC. It was President Ronald Reagan who installed him as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board in 1987. Since then, he had been reinstalled by United Presidents for four more terms without recess (Greenspan, 1). He finally retired from the Federal Reserve Board on January 31, 2006 and transferred his powers to the next Chairman, Ben Bernanke . Alan Greenspan earned a name for himself with his outstanding maneuvering of the Black Monday stock exchange crash when he was just a freshman as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. He also proved himself a good manager with his splendid handling of the dot. com boom during the 1990s economic heydays. The following paragraphs explain further his life, his economic theories and his accomplishments as chairman of the United States Federal Reserve Board (Faux, 1). As Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, he took good care of the effects brought about by the stock market bubble debacle during March of the year 2000. He then executed well during the recession that hit the United States during the 2000 to 2002 period. Alan Greenspan has been acknowledged as one of the stalwarts in the field of economic theory in the American society. His economic policies are still reverberating to many corners of the United States until today despite his retirement as Chairman of the Federal Reserves Board of the United States( Blinder, 1). He was born of Hungarian Jew Parents in Washington Heights, N. Y. He finished his Clarinet Course in the Juilliard School between the years 1943 and 1944 (Milligan, 1). He studied for his B. S. Economics diploma in New York University. He graduated with honours in 1950. He further studied for his Master in Arts in Economics in Columbia University in 1950. Unfortunately, he was not able to finish his graduate studies. He was later conferred his master’ s degree without thesis by the same school in 1977 and a doctor in philosophy major in Economics later in December, 2005 (Greenspan, 1). Alan Greenspan worked as an economic adviser in the Conference Board of New York City which advices businessmen on business and economic matters. This was his job from the years 1948 to 1953. Alan Green Span had worked as a member of the board of directors in many companies like the Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. , General Foods, Inc. , J. P. Morgan Co. , Inc. , Automatic Data Processing, Inc. , Aluminum Company of America, Pittston Company among the other jobs he had held. He married twice. His first marriage was with Joan Mitchell in 1952. This marriage lasted only for one year. He again married the media personality Barbara Walters in during the 1970s. His third wife was Andrea Mitchell who was twenty years younger than him during their marriage in 1997 (Greenspan, 1). His economic theories Alan Greenspan believed in Objectivism. He was convinced of this theory by Ayn Rand who died some time later. Alan Greenspan had espoused this objectivism theory between the years 1950 to 1970. Alan Greenspan was very vocal of his economic favorite called laissez –Faire capitalism theory. Further, Alan Greenspan believes that the United States government must set up the environment to entice both the buyers and the sellers to freely do a selling a buying activity with the least interference from the government. He had infused his Objectivism philosophy into his economic theories. He emphasized that the Gold should be the foundation of the United States economy even though the United States economy is centered on the fiat money system with the influence of inflation affecting the increase in the prices of basic goods and necessities (Jones, 1). Likewise, many objectivists complained that his stint as chairman of the federal reserves board had made him throw away to the dust bin his objectivist as well as his free market economy. Many complained that he was now acting like a puppet of the United States president doing what the president commands him to do. Thus, he answered their charges by stating that every person who is a buyer or a seller has economic freedom. Meaning, the seller can sell as high a price as he could offer. On the other hand, the buyer has the freedom to buy as low a price as he could bid. In the end, both the buyers and the sellers will have to meet halfway and this called meeting price is the equilibrium price. Another term for this equilibrium amount is market price (Lapp, Douglass, Laksanasut, 1). This is what he answered as his basic economic theory in defense of his principles. In fact, he stated that his personal views and theories of economics had to budge a little to give way to all pressures brought about by the different affected sectors of the monetary public as Chairman of the Federal Reserves Board. He even insists the United States economy will do excellently without the interference of the United States Central Bank if the gold standard is put into place. For, he explains that the United States paper bills and coins are backed by their equivalent amount in gold bullions stocked safely within the fortified vaults of the United States Central Bank. In terms of mortgage negotiations, Alan Greenspan prodded the usual players in the mortgage industry to increase the types of mortgages in order to encourage more people to happily venture into the mortgage loan business (Tuccille, 1). His term as chairman of The Federal Reserve. Alan Greenspan’s appointment as the Chairman of the Federal Reserves Bank in 1987 by then President Ronald Reagan was made to replace the retiring Paul Volcker. The United States senators immediately approved his nomination to this prestigious and at the same time precarious position. For, the eyes of the financial community within the United States as well as its business contacts outside America are constantly on their toes watching every move Alan Greenspan makes (Tuccille, 1). His mental and physical aptitude was immediately put to the test when the bond market was harassed by a one day decline in the bond market price which had only occurred for the first time five years age. Also, the stock market crash in 1987 had the United States economy pushed against the wall. Alan Greenspan successful fought out these two debacles when he stated that the Federal government stands firm in its resolve to aid any American business that needs immediate money to keep their business going until the rarely rough situation will simmer down to tranquil and predictable economic conditions. In resolve, Alan Greenspan rode the rough economic difficulties by decreasing the value of the United States dollar. Further, he camouflaged his every action and reaction to any economic and business situation by using speeches that were so blurred as the chairman of the Federal Reserves Board. His blurred speeches were his technique of keeping his detractors off -guard because they could not understand the real meanings behind his speeches. For, he did this to give him an added advantage. For example, he declared in one of his famous speeches that if a person feels that he or she understands fully the meaning of Alan Greenspan’s speeches, then this person is actually misunderstanding the speaker (Tuccille, 1). He admits his being misunderstood by the general public will give him enough flexibility to remedy any economic situation before the public finally comes around to fully comprehend what Alan Greenspan’s real intentions are. In fact, Alan Greenspan never explained to the public the relation of both the inflation rate and the current economic conditions to his decision as chairman of the Federal Reserves Board to decrease the interest rates. Definitely, the interest rates will consequently affect the increase or decrease in the number of loans transacted through the banks and other financial intermediaries. He had also orchestrated the increase in the credibility of the financial markets in his desire to beat inflation (Greenspan, 1). For, Alan Greenspan believes that the unemployment rate is greatly influenced by inflation. As inflation increases, then there is a higher probability that many workers will be retrenched. Finally, as chairman of the Federal Reserves Board, he was instrumental in beating recession with his extra efforts pursued to lower the interest rate within the United States. In fact, Alan Greenspan was instrumental in lowering the interest rate from 3. 5% to only 3. 0 percent to soften the impact of the September 11, 2001 twin towers plane attacks. This reduction rippled economically causing an increase in the houses sold as well as increases in the refinancing industry (Blinder, 1). Alan Greenspan believed in Objectivism. Alan Greenspan was very vocal of his economic favorite called laissez –Faire capitalism. Alan Greenspan sailed smoothly through the rough times in terms of economic debacles Further, he camouflaged his every action and reaction to any economic and business situation by using speeches that were so blurred during his stay as the chairman of the Federal Reserves Board. Conclusively, he was very instrumental in bringing the Unites States’ high above the murky workers of inflation, recession and unemployment.

Henry James Daisy Miller and Edith Whartons The Age of Innocence Essa

Both Daisy Miller by Henry James and The Age of Innocence, based on the novel by Edith Wharton are either social commentaries or love stories set in corrupt society. The male leads, Newland Archer and Winterbourne, help to show, assuming the goal is commentary, the dishonest and frivolous nature of society. Newland and Winterbourne’s stories and characters run on corresponding motives, as they are the offspring of that society. Each character has an affair. Winterbourne’s is subtle, presented more as his single interest, but it is told that his presence in Geneva (at both the beginning and end of the novel) is for the purpose of â€Å"’studying,’† but â€Å"when certain persons spoke of him they affirmed that the reason of his spending so much time at Geneva was that he was extremely devoted to a lady who lived there—a foreign lady—a person older than himself (Part I.)† As Winterbourne is â€Å"extremely devoted,† then his time with Daisy must be considered an affair, whether or not it amounted to anything more than flirtation. Newland’s affair is more obvious, as both May, his wife, and Ellen, his secret love, play major roles in the story. However, it is difficult to assign blame to either man for his affair, for each is a paragon gentleman who cares deeply about the honor of the women in his life. Winterbourne is bound by his gentleman’s manners to preserve the societal position of Daisy. In Part II, when Daisy is walking on the streets of Rome with two gentlemen, Winterbourne shows that he does care for Daisy’s honor: â€Å"’Does Mr. Winterbourne think,’ she asked slowly, smiling, throwing back her head, and glancing at him from head to foot, ‘that, to save my reputation, I ought to get into the carriage?’ W... ...e were safe with you, and always would be. Because once, when she asked you to, you gave up the thing you wanted most.’† However, though both men’s affairs are known, they are never openly criticized. Both Newland and Winterbourne are rich, proud men who have been involved in affairs. But yet, we perceive them both in a positive light. We see Winterbourne as a man carried along for an exciting journey through his affection for Daisy, and Archer as the finest gentlemen torn between two women. The attitude that is allowed by the authors suggests that men are permitted affairs, while women require the protection of the men that might betray them. High society, at the time, was polite, charming, and secret. No one spoke ill of another publicly, though each and every member of society was allowed, and seemingly encouraged, to make their own assumptions.

The Azande

There are several institutions at play in modern day American culture function inning similarly to the witchcraft among the Cezanne people. For instance, within my culture, the Government dictates who punished when confronted with a crime. While The Cezanne place e the blame on witchcraft.Both use justice in a sense to place blame for an unfortunate happy inning, whether it be decided by an oracle, or common law. Whether it be a judge or an oracle, a sentencing verdict is decided in both cult rues. The ways of American law may be seen as more civilized, and the Cezanne may seem tab 00. The methods of the poison oracles, which included the envenoming of animals to observe t heir deaths and make assessments, is vaguely similar to the tests done on rodents, and other animals in research labs.Both of which can and have been labeled unorthodox in the past. Its SAA d in The Cezanne culture that witches may have caused harm unintentionally, and that sorcerer s do so intentionally. Also, rel ated in our society is the psychopath. Some believe that you are both with an instinct to kill without selector, while others believe that you are strictly Think about the ways in which members of your society are compelled to bee eave in socially acceptable ways. How do these differ from one another?Members of today's society are expected to behave in socially acceptable way due to fear of retribution. For example, due to the impending threat of prison, or other capital punishment, a crime would usually not be committed. These means of socially behaviors differ from each other greatly. To contrast American Culture who mainly have regular criminals with faulty intentions, The Cezanne only have sorcerers with a vendetta against the victim. The Cezanne can only speculate whom they argued with has hexed them.They also have ways to reprimand, although their old unethical forms of punishment, such as tying individuals to ant hills have been done away with. Both measures were used as a ba sis of r social control. Is there a â€Å"logic† to The Cezanne belief in witchcraft and the casualty of misfire nun? Within The Cezanne culture, there is a logic behind their belief in witchcraft an d the casualty of misfortune. While reading a section from Culture Sketches by Holly Peters Golden, the quote from an Cezanne man put many aspects of The Azans De thought process into perspective.After a man had hanged himself, due to an altercate on with his brothers the man stated only crazy people commit suicide; if everyone who was angry with their brothers committed suicide there would soon be no people left in t he world; if the man had not been bewitched he would not have done what he did do (19 37;. 71 v Personally, this quote opened my eyes to the ways that someone raised in HTH complex civilization would make sense of a tragedy. It is very en lightening to s e the says brains execute different ideas based on your upbringing in different par TTS of the world.Do you emplo y logic that is similar or different when explaining negative even Are there several different â€Å"systems of logic† that may be invoked, depending on the circumstances? Tend to enjoy logic that is differs from my own, when negative events are bee Eng explained. In other words to seeing an event occur from another's viewpoint I n their own words. Hearing logic that is not the same as your own on sensitive topics with out prejudice, and seeking knowledge where you may be ignorant allows a differed t system of logic.Depending on the circumstances, there are several different logical systems t hat may be invoked. When those involved are from different backgrounds, with u unlike views, and beliefs to base their opinions upon. Most logical people would never take witchcraft into question, perhaps they would say that it was an accident. But being raise Diana community where sorcery is common practice, you would not think any differ entry. What you are taught from a young age in y our community resonates into the ways t hat the person you will becomes handles misfortune.

Everyman Script - Our Interpretation - 1523 Words

Jester [Clowns-Introduction.] I pray you all give audience, For our play is a moral play. The summoning of everyman And doth of our lives and ending show. Look well, take heed To thy ending, For sin, though in the beginning so sweet, Yet doth cause in the end for the soul to weep, When the body lieth in clay. How will fade from thee as flowers in may, Thy strength and thy beauty, thy pleasure and folly, When thou art called to a reckoning, Like everyman, to out heavenly King. Give audience and hear our play. Gods messenger comes, List to what he doth say. Gabriel I, Gabriel am, Gods messenger am I. Here on earth for yet this little time, I see how all His creatures Be to their God unkind. Drowned in sin, in†¦show more content†¦Goods Nay, Everyman, I sing another song, I follow no man such a way along. For thou wouldst find if I went with thee, Thou wouldst fare much the worse for me. I needs must laugh, I cannot be sad, Whereof I am glad. Everyman I pray thee to go with me indeed Goods Go with thee? Nay! This world is my way, Therefore I bid thee good day. Everyman To whom shall I now make my heavy moan? Or must I go this fearful way alone? I go to my Good Deeds, But alas she is so weak, That she can neither stand nor speak. My Good Deeds, where art thou? Good Deeds Thy sins have me so sore bound Here I lie, cold on the ground. Everyman I heard thee tell, That thou art called, account to make Before the Lord of heaven and hell Everyman Oh, Good Deeds, wilt thou go with me? Good Deeds If thou hadst but remembered me, Thy book of accounts full ready would be Everyman Oh, Good Deeds, wilt thou go with me? Good Deeds If thou hadst but remembered me, Thy book of accounts full ready would be Everyman Good Deeds I pray thee help me in this need, Or else I am forever lost indeed! Good Deeds Though for thy sins I am thus laid low I have a sister called Knowledge who shall with thee go. Knowledge Everyman, I will go with thee and be thy guide, In thy most need to go by thy side. Good Deeds With everyman I will go and not spare His good works will I help him to declare. Knowledge Now Everyman be merry and glad, ThyShow MoreRelatedHow Important Are Mental Representations in Cognitive Theories1794 Words   |  8 PagesHOW IMPORTANT ARE MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS IN COGNITIVE THEORIES? How the world around us is represented mentally is the corner stone of cognitive architectures. It facilitates understanding of information received and perceived from our environment. The storage and retrieval of knowledge would be impossible without mental representations. Mental representations are the way in which we create ‘copies of the real things around us, which we perceive. A description of a representation is a symbolRead More Christopher Nolans Memento Essay5013 Words   |  21 Pagestheatrical viewings, three of them with copious note taking; a fifth viewing on videotape, with lots of whipping back and forth to check for differences in repeated shots, and slo-mo attention to quick-cut subliminal moments; reading the published script and comparing it to the film; reading the short story, Memento Mori, written by Nolans brother Jonathan and credited as the films source; and a few trips through www.otnemem.com, the films official Web site, also by Jonathan Nolan. More thanRead MoreStrategy Safari by Mintzberg71628 Words   |  287 Pagessome parts may appeal more to practitioners, while others may be more of interest to the academically inclined. This is in the nature of the beast. We did not set out to domesticate it but to make it frie ndly. We wanted readers from everywhere to join our safari. But at the same time we want to challenge you. We take risks and hope that they will invigorate you. For as we argue throughout, the field of strategic management needs to be opened up, not closed down; it needs reconciliation among its manyRead MoreAn Introduction to Intercultural Communication29172 Words   |  117 Pagesrefers to an ability to read into situations, contexts and behaviours that are culturally rooted and be able to react to them appropriately. An suitable response necessitates that the actor no longer carries his/her own culturally determined interpretations of the situation or behaviour (i.e. good/bad, right/wrong) which can only be nurtured through both cross cultural knowledge and awareness. Cross Cultural Competence is and should be the aim of all those dealing with multicultural clients, customers